Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance

9m 16sLänge

Does quantum entanglement make faster-than-light communication possible? What is NOT random? http://bit.ly/NOTrandoVe First, I know this video is not easy to understand. Thank you for taking the time to attempt to understand it. I've been working on this for over six months over which time my understanding has improved. Quantum entanglement and spooky action at a distance are still debated by professors of quantum physics (I know because I discussed this topic with two of them). Does hidden information (called hidden variables by physicists) exist? If it does, the experiment violating Bell inequalities indicates that hidden variables must update faster than light - they would be considered 'non-local'. On the other hand if you don't consider the spins before you make the measurement then you could simply say hidden variables don't exist and whenever you measure spins in the same direction you always get opposite results, which makes sense since angular momentum must be conserved in the universe. Everyone agrees that quantum entanglement does not allow information to be transmitted faster that light. There is no action either detector operator could take to signal the other one - regardless of the choice of measurement direction, the measured spins are random with 50/50 probability of up/down. Special thanks to: Prof. Stephen Bartlett, University of Sydney: http://bit.ly/1xSosoJ Prof. John Preskill, Caltech: http://bit.ly/1y8mJut Looking Glass Universe: http://bit.ly/17zZH7l Physics Girl: http://bit.ly/PhysGirl MinutePhysics: http://bit.ly/MinPhys Community Channel: http://bit.ly/CommChannel Nigel, Helen, Luke, and Simon for comments on earlier drafts of this video. Filmed in part by Scott Lewis: http://google.com/+scottlewis Music by Amarante "One Last Time": http://bit.ly/VeAmarante

Kommentare

hey derek i want discuss a subject or an idea to you... i dont know whether its foolish ... the idea is this ** what is entangled particles are micro worm holes ** which transfers magnetic field applied on to it at one side
Would communication through entangled particle pairs be possible, if we artificially alter the spin of one particle with a magnetic field or something like that so it has a spin that we can predict or even manipulate. So spin up = 0 and spin down =1, like in binary. When we manipulate one paricle to have a s-up, so 0 value, the other particle should display a 1 value, right? So if we want so send the message "110100" to someone, we change or manipulate the spin of our particle to be "001011". And the person in "possession" of the other particle can read our message in observing the changes in spin on his particle. Would that work?
0:38 introducing the "veritasium particle"
When I hear "Spooky Action at a Distance", I just imagine a distant view of a skeleton dancing .
How do they have angular momentum if they aren't spinning?
that body suit you have on looks like rhythm x 2010. Google it.
I don't think the connection is faster- than-light. It think the connection transcends space.
may the particles be connected in the 4th dimension?
I know it sounds stupid but hey, it's quantum physics. So please explain: how can you 'take' one particle and move it far away and measure the other particle? Like, how do you even know where it is?
If the particles form at the same point in space, how do you measure them lightyears apart?
I don't understand how these particles are paired? how do you know which particles are paired when u measure them both?
If this doesn't convince you that you're Gods, nothing will.
So.....
Say two person are very far away, they arent moving. They adjust their clocks to the same time. Person A checks his particle at 11h everyday and person B his at 11:05. They agree that if B gets down spin he will press a button. They only do that once per day. Does that count as sending information because its triggering an event?
he had me, lost me, got me back, lost me again, then kind of had me, just to lose me again
One "simple" and nahive question: What do we really see in a movie that shows us the atoms ( there are a few of them here in youtube )?? Those "marbles" that we see would be the electron external orbital (?) But...what about the wave function collapse? Shouldn't this "electron position probability cloud" collapses and shows us the electrons themselves? Besides, of course, they are too much small to be seen.... And as always...sorry for my poor english.
great video, one of the best I have ever seen on this hard to grasp topic (and I've seen many!)

Quantum Entanglement & Spooky Action at a Distance

wie Sie tun, machen, Film, Beispiel

Kommentare